The Influence Of The Imf Economics Essay

This essay concentrates on an administration that actively seeks to act upon international economic policy, more specifically the International Monetary Fund ( IMF ) . This essay will explicate what countries of international economic policy the IMF is most acute to act upon, and how the administration ‘s adopted political doctrine relates to the economic involvements of those it claims to stand for. This essay will besides look at the successes and failures of the IMF, and if the policies they have adopted and used were good or non. First this essay will give a brief background on the IMF. Second the IMF policies will be highlighted and analysed to see if they worked the manner it was ab initio intended, illustrations would be given to demo this. Third an rating would be made to see if these policies were the right 1s to implement, and if they had worked expeditiously, and if non why and what other policies could hold been adopted ; such as were and are the structural accommodation plans effectual or uneffective.

The IMF was created in 1946 during the United Nations pecuniary and fiscal conference to advance international pecuniary stableness and cooperation is an international administration of 186 states that oversees the planetary fiscal system by following its macroeconomic policies of its member states. ( International Monetary Fund. Kosovo. 2009. Viewed on 30 August ) . It was intended to advance trade through promoting stable exchange rates and supplying extra international liquidness to enable states to avoid the demand for trade limitations and exchange controls. It besides offers extremely leveraged loans to chiefly poorer states. ( Black, John. 1997. Pg 247 – 248 ) ( Sheffrin, Steven M. 2003. Pg 488 ) ( Steger, Manfred B. 2003. Pg 52 ) .

After the 1970s the economic docket of the IMF and the World Bank has synchronised neoliberal involvement to incorporate and deregulate markets around the universe. ( Steger, Manfred B. 2003. Pg 52 ) The IMF is placed to assist member authoritiess take advantages of the chances and manage challenges posed by globalization and economic development. The IMF paths planetary economic tendencies and public presentation, alerts its member states when it sees a job, provides a policy duologue, and gives advice to authoritiess on how to undertake certain economic troubles. The IMF provides policy advice and funding to members who are economically in problem and they besides work with developing states to seek and assist them accomplish macroeconomic stableness and cut down poorness. ( International Monetary Fund. About The IMF. Viewed 31st August 2009 )

Structural Adjustment is a term used by the IMF to depict the policy alterations implemented in developing states. These policy alterations are conditions for acquiring new loans from the IMF or for obtaining lower involvement rates on bing loans. Structural Adjustment Programs or Structural Adjustment Policies ( SAPs ) are created with the end of cut downing the adoption state ‘s financial instabilities. ( & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed 31st August 2009 ) ( The OECD.2005. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed on 31st August 2009 ) .

The set of neoliberal policies is frequently referred as the ‘Washington Consensus ‘ . In pattern, the footings of the plan spelled out a new signifier of colonialism. The 10 points of the Washington Consensus required authoritiess to implement the undermentioned structural accommodations in order to measure up for loans: A warrant of financial and a kerb, to budget shortages ; a decrease of public outgo ; revenue enhancement reform ; fiscal liberalization ; with involvement rates determined by the market ; competitory exchange rates, to help export led growing ; Trade liberalization, publicity of foreign direct investing ; denationalization of province endeavors ; deregulating of the economic system and protection of belongings rights ( Steger, Manfred B. 2003. Pg 53 ) .

In theory all these seem really clean in order to acquire a loan from the IMF nevertheless, structural accommodation plans seldom produce the coveted consequence of developing debitor societies, because mandated cuts in public disbursement translate into, reduced educational chances, more environmental pollution, and greater poorness for the huge bulk of people.

The IMF has played many major functions in most of import economic events in the yesteryear. It helped maneuver many of the former Soviet Union states and others that were once centrally planned toward going successful market economic systems. It help near achieve near consensus among economic policy shapers on the importance of financial duty and of maintaining the rising prices low. It provided support to states at peculiarly nerve-racking periods, such as when states fell into fiscal crisis. ( Macmillan, Palgrave. 2009. Pg 3-5 ) there have been many successful public presentations by the IMF such as the Brazilian experience of 2002-03, but at that place have besides been failures such as the East Asiatic Financial Crisis, and perchance today ‘s Global Financial Crisis, which will be analysed subsequently on in this essay.

In 2002, Brazil ‘s economic system was enduring from lingering financial and current history jobs, contagious disease from the crisis in neighboring Argentina ( which accounts as a success for the IMF ) , and the chance that economic policies would be significantly altered after the elections. ( United Press Article. 2002. Viewed 1st September ) . An IMF standby agreement helped reconstruct assurance and stabalise the economic system, finally ensuing to low rising prices, contracting income disparities, and decreased poorness. ( International Monetary Fund. Brazil.2007. Viewed 1st September ) . Brazil was on the threshold of a crisis, brought on frights about economic policy alterations that might follow the election. A loan from the IMF of about $ 30bn was likely one of the largest of all time made, helped quiet fiscal markets. ( Mulligan, Robert F. 2002. Viewed 1st September ) . Brazil ‘s economic and fiscal state of affairs improved significantly during the election triumph. The state ‘s new authorities policies were both prudent and brave uniting both financial and pecuniary subject with critical enterprises to alleviate poorness. The ensuing addition in policy credibleness led to the narrowing of autonomous bond spreads that skyrocketed during 2002. When international fiscal markets became more volatile in 2004, the authorities ‘s attempts to cut down exposures paid away. Higher international militias, betterment in the construction of domestic public debt, and a swing to current history excesss helped restrict the impact on Brazil. ( Goldfajn, Ilan. 2003. Pg 1-2 ) . ( Mulligan, Robert F. 2002. Viewed 1st September )

During a 2006 seminar titled “ Who Needs the IMF? “ The Brookings Institute offered this appraisal of the IMF ‘s aid to Brazil:

“ See, for illustration, the Fund ‘s hazardous and originative loaning bundle to Brazil in August 2002, when markets were terrified that the at hand election of left-of-center President Luiz Inacio Lula district attorney Silva would bring on Brazil to project aside its freshly stable macroeconomic policies. With market entree all of a sudden stop deading up and the state on the threshold of default, the Fund stepped in with $ 30 billion. The Fund ‘s loan arguably helped debar a meltdown that would hold slammed planetary markets from Manila to Istanbul, and forestalled the benign period that emerging market economic systems have enjoyed the past few old ages. ” ( Rogoff, Kenneth. 2006. Viewed 1st September )

This suggests that the IMF ‘s structural accommodation policies have been working comparatively good, and that their economic purposes have been reasonably satisfied in this instance. However in the undermentioned paragraph the East Asiatic Financial Crisis of 1997 would be looked at, as it is one of the events that the IMF has been to a great extent critiqued and looked down upon the most. Their policies did non look to do the economic system better in the sense that, poorness was non reduced and exchange rates non stabilised.

The East Asiatic Economic Crisis happened in 1997, it all began when the Thai tical collapsed, it was a crisis that would distribute and endanger the full universe. By the terminal of the twelvemonth what had started as an exchange rate catastrophe threatened to take down many of the part ‘s Bankss, stock markets, and even full economic systems. Even with the crisis over many states such as Indonesia still experience the effects of the crisis old ages after. Unfortunately, the IMF policies imposed during the clip made the state of affairs even worse. ( Reynolds, David. 2000. Pg 650 – 657 ) . ( Krugman, Paul. 2008. Pg 77 – 78, 84 – 85 ) ( Fischer, Stanley. 1998. Conference. Viewed on 2nd September ) .

Since the IMF was founded to cover with crises of this sort, the fact that it failed in so many ways led to a major rethinking of its function. In hindsight, it became clear that the IMF policies non merely decline the downswings but were partly responsible for the oncoming: overly rapid fiscal and capital market liberalization was likely the individual most of import cause of the crisis, though misguided policies on the portion of the states themselves played a function every bit good. ( Stiglitz, Joseph. 2002. Pg 89 – 90 ) .

Conversely, though it may look that the IMF and its policies were a failure, some other beginnings discuss that the state of affairs and the engagement of the IMF were misunderstood. Although the jobs in the development states were largely home-grown, developments in the advanced economic systems and planetary fiscal markets contributed significantly to the build-up of the instabilities that finally led to the crises. ( Fischer, Stanley. 1998. Conference. Viewed on 2nd September ) . Some have argued that the structural accommodation plans are excessively tough, either in naming for higher involvement rates, fastening authorities budget shortages, or shuting down fiscal establishments. So by the clip the troubled states approached the IMF, the value of their currencies were plumping, and in the instance of Thailand, militias were perilously low. Thus the first order of concern was to reconstruct assurance in the currency. Initially it was seen that the deep currency depreciation in Asia have occurred due to IMF designs, but it is believed that the currencies had depreciated far more than was warranted or desirable. Furthermore, without the IMF ‘s support as portion of an international attempt to stabilise the economic systems, it is likely that the currencies would hold lost more of its value. To change by reversal the procedure states had to increase involvement rate, even if it complicated the state of affairs of weak Bankss and corporations. This was a lesson learnt from the “ tequila crisis ” in Latin America 1994 – 95, every bit good as from the Brazil experience which managed to fend the onslaughts on their currencies with tight involvement rates along with other back uping policy steps. ( Fischer, Stanley. 1998. Conference. Viewed on 2nd September ) .

The Global Financial Crisis that we face today is one crisis that the IMF may be to a great extent critiqued upon particularly after the Asiatic Crisis. The Global Financial Crisis began in July 2007 when a loss of assurance in the investors in the value of securitised mortgages in the US resulted in a liquidness crisis that prompted a significant injection of capital into fiscal markets by the United States Federal Reserve, Bank of England and the European Central Bank. ( Wall Street Journal. 2007. Viewed 2nd September ) ( Norris, Floyd. 2007. Viewed 2nd September ) ( Elliott, Larry. 2008. Viewed 2nd September ) . In September 2008, the crisis deepened, as stock markets worldwide crashed and entered a period of high volatility, and a considerable figure of Bankss, mortgage loaners and insurance companies failed in the undermentioned hebdomads. ( & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed 29th August )

The IMF has two possible functions in assisting to decide the current Global Financial Crisis: 1 ) immediate crisis control through balance of payments imparting to emerging market and less developed states and 2 ) increased surveillance fiscal regulative bureaus. The current planetary fiscal crisis is proving the ability of the IMF, in its function as the cardinal international establishment for inadvertence. Though it is extremely improbable that the IMF will impart to developed states most affected by the crisis and must vie with other international fiscal establishments as a beginning of thoughts and planetary macroeconomic policy coordination, the spillover effects of the crisis on emerging and less developed economic systems gives the IMF an chance to confirm its function in the international economic system. ( Weiss, Marti A. 2008 ) ( Krugman, Paul. 2008. pg165-169, 176 – 180 )

The current fiscal crisis represents a major challenge for the IMF particularly since the establishment is non in fiscal place to be able to impart to the United States or other Western states affected by the crisis. The IMF is entirely unequipped to supply by itself the necessary liquidness to the United States and affected industrialised states. In add-on, the United States and other Western states, along with some Middle Eastern oil provinces, are the primary subscribers to IMF resources, and it is improbable that these states would seek IMF aid.

Since the Asian Financial Crisis, many emerging market economic systems in response to their unfavorable judgment of the policy conditions that the IMF required of states having loans, have built up extended foreign modesty places in order to avoid holding to return to the IMF should such a crisis occur once more. Many analysts believe that the policies that the IMF required of states emphasised the immediate economic impact of the crisis while holding minor impact on the states long term structural reform. This indicates that the function of the IMF is decreasing, and besides because the path record of the IMF has been instead dismaying, due to their hapless policies and structural accommodation it seems that the IMF ‘s initial doctrine to stablise economic systems and cut down poorness is non being fulfilled. The IMF merely does non look to stand for their function in the universe economic system as they had originally planned to. ( Weiss, Marti A. 2008 ) .

To reason, with all the research gathered, although it may look a small prejudice, it looks like the IMF ‘s function to the remainder of the universe is non utile at all. In peculiar the structural accommodation plans to assist states in times of demand have been to a great extent critiscised, and as seen from antecedently it does non look to be working efficaciously, in fact as a consequence SAPs seem to be doing poverty worse. ( Shah, Anup. 2008 ) . ( hypertext transfer protocol: // ) The IMF has struggled to specify its function in the planetary economic system, the planetary fiscal crisis has created an chance for the IMF to beef up itself and perchance play a constructive function in deciding, or at least justifying, the effects of the planetary downswing through crisis direction and lending to long term systemic reform of the international fiscal system.

Overall the IMF success record is perceived as limited. While it was created to assist brace the planetary economic system, since 1980 critics claim over 100 states have experienced a banking prostration that they claim have reduced GDP by four per centum or more, far more than station depression history. The considerable hold in the IMFs response to any crisis, and the fact that it tends to merely react to them or even make them instead than forestall them, has led many economic experts to reason for reform. ( Davidson, Budhoo. 1990 ) . ( Krugman, Paul.2008. Pg189 ) . It is even said that the rigorous conditions on the international loans by the IMF has resulted in 1000s of deceases in Eastern Europe by TB.

On the other manus, in 2006, an IMF docket called the Medium Term Strategy was widely endorsed by the establishment ‘s member states. The docket includes alterations in IMF administration to heighten the function of developing states in the establishments determination doing procedure and stairss to intensify the effectivity of its nucleus authorization. On June 15, 2007, the Executive Board of the IMF adopted the 2007 Decision on Bilateral Surveillance, a landmark step that replaced a 30-year-old determination of the Fund ‘s member states on how the IMF should analyze economic results at the state degree. ( IMF Staff. 2006. Viewed 3rd September )

Now the IMF has been one of the few donees of the planetary economic crisis. There has been a renewed demand for IMF loaning. Members have agreed to a tripling of its resources. It has been authorized to raise extra financess by selling its ain bonds. The IMF ‘s function is still clearly non defined and still to a great extent criticised on that note. The IMF ‘s first function is to help states that, as a consequence of domestic policies, experience balance-of-payments crises.

Their authoritiess have no pick but to borrow from the Fund. The job is that the IMF has bought into the rhetoric of its critics by holding to “ streamline ” its conditionality. In fact, where structural failings are the beginning of jobs, the Fund should still necessitate structural accommodation to give aid. By looking to give land on this point in an attempt to win friends, the IMF has created unneeded confusion. A 2nd function for the IMF is to move as a planetary modesty pool. States have accumulated big militias in order to see against dazes. This is dearly-won for hapless economic systems, which could better utilize the resources for investing and ingestion. ( Eichengreen, Barry.2009. Business Daily Africa ) .

Yes, to a certain extent the function of the IMF may be perceived as unneeded and harmful. But with a small reform, and re-evaluation of policies, it is possible that in the hereafter the function of the IMF will decidedly play a bigger and better function, and would hopefully act upon economic policies in a more positive manner.


The International Monetary Fund. 2009. Kosovo Becomes the International Monetary Fund ‘s 186th Member. Press Release. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed 30th August.

Black, John. 1997. Oxford Dictionary of Economics. Oxford University Press. Pg 247 – 248

Sheffrin, Steven M. 2003. Economicss: Principles in Action. Pg 488

Steger, Manfred B. 2003. Globalization: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. Pg 52 – 53

The International Monetary Fund. About The IMF. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed 31st August.

& lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed 31st August

The OECD. 2005. Trade and Structural Adjustment. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed 31st August.

Macmillan, Palgrave. 2009. Successs of the International Monetary Fund: Untold Narratives of Cooperation at Work. Edited by Ian McDonald. Macmillan Publishers Ltd. Pg 3 – 5.

United Press Article. 2002. Brazil Reported to Seek IMF financess. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed 1st September.

International Monetary Fund. 2007. Brazil: Helping Calm Financial Markets. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Mulligan, Robert F. 2002. The International monetary fund: Successs and Failures. Western Carolina University. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed 1st September.

Goldfahn, Ilan. 2003. The Brazilian Crisis, The Role of the IMD and Democratic Governability. Pg 1 – 3.

Rogodd, Kenneth. 2006. Global Economy and Development. Newsweek International. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed 1st September

Reynolds, David. 2000. One World Divisible: A Global History Since 1945. Penguin Books. Pg 650 – 657.

Krugman, Paul. 2008. The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008. Penguin Books Ltd. Pg 77- 78, 165 – 169, 176 – 180, 189.

Fischer, Stanley. 1998. The Asiatic Crisis: The Position from the IMF. First Deputy Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund at the Midwinter Conference of the Bankers ‘ Association for Foreign Trade. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed 2nd September

Stiglitz, Joseph. 2002. Globalization and Its Discontentments. Penguin Books Ltd. Pg 89- 90.

Wall Street Journal. 2007. TED Spread Spikes in July 2007. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //¬pkrugman/ted-spread-wsj.gif & gt ;

Norris, Floyd. 2007. A New Kind of Bank Run Test Old Safeguards. The New York Times. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed 2nd September.

Elliott, Larry. 2008. Credit-Crisis – How It All Began. The Guardian

The Age. 2009. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed 29th August.

Weiss, Martin A. 2008. CRS Report for Congress. The Global Financial Crisis: The Role of the International Monetary Fund ( IMF ) . Specialist in International Trade and Finance Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division.

Shah, Anup. 2008. Structural Adjustment – A Major Cause of Poverty. Global Issues Article.

& lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

IMF Staff. 2006. A Average Term Strategy for the IMF: Meeting the Challenge of Globalisation. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ; Viewed 3rd September

Eichengreen, Barry. 2009. IMF has a Opportunity to Deliver Itself. Business Daily Africa.