The effects of remittances on development and national economic growth


Remittances have emerged as an of import beginning of external development finance for developing states and raised a batch of arguments in the academic community in recent old ages. How do remittals impact equity and inequality in societal and economic chances within communities? Do remittals increase people ‘s capablenesss to protect themselves from income dazes? How do remittals impact people non having them? Make some of the remittals indirectly accrue to them through investings and income multipliers, or do they alternatively deepen their poorness and inequalities? These are merely some of the few talking-points that come out of the treatment of remittals today. The intent of this paper is to supply an understandment of what remittals are and what multiple effects can they convey to people and economic systems as whole.



Remittances are fiscal resource flows originating from the cross-border motion of subjects of a state. The narrowest definition – aˆzunrequited transportations ” – refers chiefly to money sent by migrators to household and friends on which there are no claims by the transmitter, unlike other fiscal flows such as debt or equity flows ( Kapur, 2004 ) .

A broader definition used for academic intents sums up together three classs[ 1 ]: aˆzworker ‘s remittals ” , which are current private transportations from migratory workers shacking in a given state to receivers in their state of beginning ; aˆzmigrant transportations ” , which arise from the migration ( alteration of abode for at least a twelvemonth ) of persons from one economic system to another and are equal to the net worth of the migrators ; and aˆzcompensation of employees ” , which are financess send back by impermanent workers ( who work abroad for less than a twelvemonth ) .

However, the practical application of these definitions has been hard and still raises a batch of inquiries[ 2 ]when it comes to specify migratory position or to do differentiations between the given classs.

Remittances from the position of different migrational theories

Over the past four decennaries a het argument has been traveling on about the extent to which migration and remittals can convey sustained human development and economic growing. The theoretical mentality on remittals has gone through at least four different periods with “ developmentalist ” optimism ruling the 1950s and 1960s, large-scale pessimism in the 1970s and 1980s, the outgrowth of more nuanced positions in the 1990s and the current rediscovery of remittals, together with renascent optimism on migration ( de Haas, 2007 ) .

In the developmentalist epoch of the 1950s and 1960s, many developing states became involved in the migration procedure through plans such as aˆzguest worker ” that were aimed at reconstructing post-war Europe. Governments of developing states started to actively promote out-migration since they considered it as one of the chief instruments to advance national development. The general outlook was that the flow of remittals – every bit good as the experience, accomplishments and cognition that migrators would get abroad before returning – would greatly assist developing states in their economic take-off. The optimistic point of position was carried on by neoclassic economic experts subsequently, nevertheless, they denied the effects of remittals and emphatic factor monetary value equalisation.

The 1973 oil crisis changed the optimistic positions on migration. An increasing figure of academic surveies seemed to back up the hypothesis that migration sustains or even reinforces jobs of underdevelopment alternatively of the contrary. Migration pessimists argued that migration provokes the backdown of human capital and this would so take to the development of inactive, non-productive and remittance-dependent communities. They besides argued that remittals, alternatively of being used as productive invesments, addition ingestion and this could take to inflationary force per unit areas. The chief possitive consequence of remittals – the addition in household public assistance – has been seen as unreal and unsafe, since remittals were considered to be an unstable and impermanent flow of gross. Related to pesimistic attack, dependence and structuralist theories on development suggested that remittals exacerbate international inequalities.

The new economic sciences of labour migration and support attacks developed in 1980s and 1990s. They observed migration and development from a much more elusive point of position. These pluralistic attacks linked causes and effects of migration more explicitly, the manner both positive and negative development responses were possible. Academic thought was revitalized to concentrate more on families instead than persons entirely.

Today, a raising involvement in migration, remittal and development relation is followed by assorted, but by and large positive positions. However, the statements raised both by optimistic and pesimistic cantonments persist as an country of argument until these yearss.

Problems of mensurating remittal informations

Despite being one of the extremely discussed migration related subjects, the analysis of remittals, their flows, tendencies and effects is sometimes condemned to come to a dead-end, due to the many defects related to remittance informations. The lone beginning of internationally comparable informations on remittals that is consistently maintained and collected are the statistics on the Balance of Payments, managed by the International Monetary Fund. However, seting a closer expression on it, important failings reveal.

The first issue of mensurating remittal flows is a misunderstanding of what is defined by the term aˆzremittances ” . Some states that report to IMF fail to do proper informations sets and as a consequence study either worker ‘s remittals or compensation of employees, but non both. Different states use different techniques to capture remittals, and it is ill-defined how comparable the reported informations are.

Indeed, some states report no information on remittals at all to the IMF. In the twelvemonth 2000 – 2001 a sum of 34 states had no informations available for the entrance remittal flows, while 45 states did non describe remittal escapes ( Kaphur, 2004 ) . The most distressing spreads in informations are in the underdeveloped states like for illustration Afghanistan, where the path on remittals is non kept even though remittals could be a important beginning of external income.

Another issue is that rather frequently the information on remittals is provided with clip slowdowns, or is non available for several old ages in the past, doing it hard to make strict analysis, while some states report informations that is unexplicable[ 3 ]under plausible scenarios at all.

Finally, as notices Ghosh ( 2005 ) , the flows of remittals are frequently overestimated since normally they include merely the gross figures of remittals sent to developing states and exclude the transportations made to rich states or between the developing states themselves. This means, that the net sums received by developing states are really much smaller. High costs of transportations, although now being lowered in some of the states, can be up to 20 % of the sum remitted and besides cut down these flows. On the other manus, a large portion of all remittals go through unofficial chanels and some researches suggest that merely 36 % of these flows are represented by official Numberss.

Kepping in head all of the above, following researches and analysis on remittals discussed in this paper should be interpretated sing these restrictions.

The tendencies of remittal flows

Remittances have emerged as the least unstable and progressively of import beginning of external funding for many developing states and represent the individual most of import beginning of insurance for many hapless states. Over the past decennary they became the 2nd largest beginning of net fiscal flows after foreign direct investing ( FDI ) , three times larger than the volume of official development aid ( ODA ) and more than eight times larger than portfolio investing flows.

Harmonizing to statistics[ 4 ]in 2002 remittals amounted to 149.4 billion USD, which was equal to 83,7 % of FDI flow ( 178.4 billion USD ) and 309 % of ODA flow ( 48.4 billion USD ) . Remittances besides proved to be the most stable fiscal flow that, unlike other types of fiscal flows, did non see sudden upturns or downturs, but alternatively showed a steady growing over the twelvemonth 1988-2002 ( SOPEMI, 2006 ) .

The tendencies of remittal flows show that remittals are unevenly distributed in the universe, with an norm of 43 % of the flows traveling to Asia, around 20 % to Latin America and the Caribbean and approximately 17 % received by Central and Eastern Europe. Meanwhile, merely 10 % of remittals go to Africa, and 10 % to the Middle East. However, if measuring remittals per capita, so Middle East are clearly in a far better place than Africa, having three times above the norm of remittals per capita, with Africa having about 40 % below the norm.

Since Asia is the most thickly settled part of the universe and besides has the most legion diaspora, it is non surprising that while it receives the biggest portion of gross remittace flows, the remittals per capita autumn 28 % below the norm. In the same regard, when compared to population, remittals per capita to Eastern Europe climb 65 % above the norm.

The fact that the remittals to Africa remain rather low and demo small growing in the last five old ages could either bespeak hapless informations available, or that the adjacency to rich states is clearly of import. Proximity to rich states eases illegal migration, which can be felt in instances of Mexico and Central America, while migration from Africa is much more compilcated due to geographical place, costs of migration, legal footings and other.

The general feeling is that remittals are a phenomenon impacting hapless states is merely partially true. Although a recent mentality on remittal statistics shows that remittal are of great importance to a figure of hapless states such as Tonga, Lesotho, Jordan, Moldova and others, amounting to 20 – 40 % of their GDP, other researches show that the majority of international remittals do non accrue to the poorest states. Kaphur ( 2004 ) says that while about half of all remittals received by developing states flow to take down middle-income states, the other half flows about every bit to upper in-between income and low income states. He besides notices that the ten largest beginnings and receivers in the twelvemonth 1992 – 2001 include both developed and developing states, with seven of the top receivers being OECD states and two of them members[ 5 ]of G-5. And, with the United States unsurprisingly being the largest beginning, four Middle-East states[ 6 ]are among the 10 largest beginnings every bit good.

Why did remittals turn in the recent old ages? The ground underlying the growing of remittals is a steady growing of its chief cause – migration. Because remittals emerge as concequence of migration, any future alterations in migration tendencies are to alter the flows of remittals every bit good. And although some of the research workers argue, that over clip after settling and incorporating in the host society remittals sent by persons would worsen, there is non adequate support for this theory ( de Haas, 2007 ) .

The impact of remittals on families and community public assistance

The effects of remittals are complex and can be seen as a map of the features of the persons that emigrate, their motives, the families they leave behind, and the overall economic environment. In contrast to other fiscal flows, remittals do non make any claims by the transmitter and therefore it is frequently said that the motivations for directing remittals are largely selfless ( SOPEMI, 2006 ) . This aˆzunrequited ” nature of remittals that makes them so of import in relation to other fiscal flows.

However, the effects of migration and remittals on the households and communities left behind are rather different in the short-term and over a longer period of clip ( de Haas, 2007 ) . In the short term these effects could be negative due to a sudden labor force loss. In the really first phase of out-migration the remittals will likely be little and would increase merely after the migrator has settled in the finish and found a unafraid employment. And, merely after the basic demands of the family left behind will be fulfilled ( nutrient, wellness, vesture, etc. ) , the remittals are likely to be invested in commercial endeavors such as agribusiness, large-scale lodging, commercialism and so on.

Ghosh ( 2005:178 ) says, aˆzRemittances are non needfully a net add-on to the family budget or the economic system. “ , i. e. there is ever an chance cost of out-migration and it amounts to the end product loss of the place economic system and loss of money that could theoretically be earned at place. But so he adds that migrators normally make rational cost-benefit computations and aˆzbesides the high personal ingestion fuelled by remittals, by hiking the family budget they besides promote kids ‘s schooling, better wellness, lodging and household public assistance, and, therefore, future human capital development. ” Ghosh concludes that remittals are much more effectual on family or local community degree than on macroeconomics by and large.

Remittances are besides an of import beginning of societal insurance in lower income states. Remittances provide societal protection to hapless families, which reduces exposure to floor. This can be explained as migration consequences in the household gross portfolios being diversified. A research in the Philippines has showed that families with abroad migrators have done well better, following the Asiatic crisis, than those that had no members abroad ( Kapur, 2004 ) .

However, even at the family degree remittals can hold equivocal effects. The kids and the aged left buttocks by the working members of the household are the most sensitive parts of the society. If a female parent leaves her ain kid to take attention of other kids from richer households so she can convey back money and possibly supply better hereafter for the household, but on the other manus the kid will turn up without a female parent and it is difficult to do decisions, what is more of import.

Remittances play an of import function on community degree every bit good, by assisting local communities of place states build substructure, new schools, infirmaries and financing other undertakings that otherwhise would non be realized in close hereafter. Migrant communities are more active in some states than in the others, and this is largely because non all the states manage to make a remittance-friendly environment and besides promote the diaspora to go community involved. A good illustration of how to maximise the community engagement in these procedures was demonstrated by Mexico, when it started a aˆzthree-for-program ” , by which each invested dollar is matched by a dollar from federal and province governments ( Ghosh, 2005 ) .

Remittances are besides an of import beginning of finance in developing little concerns. Kaphur ( 2004 ) argues in favor of remittals both as a mean to supply liquidness for little endeavors every bit good as capital investings – in equipment, land, preparation, etc. He besides notices that remittals traveling from private custodies to private unlike other fiscal flows do non necessitate dearly-won authorities bureaucratism and are more likely to make their purpose than to be lost due to corruptness.

Some scientific research has proved that remittals can besides indirectly affect the families that straight do non have them. Such indirect effects have non been captured by most remittance-use surveies, as consumptive outgos caused by remittals were frequently viewed as non-developmental. However, it was proved with the empirical grounds that if consumptive expensives occur within the local community in the place state, so via multiplier effects it could take to higher income for non-migrant families as good ( de Haas, 2007 ) .

The effects of remittals on development and national economic growing

The legion researches made have showed that the greatest effects of remittals can be observed on persons, families and communities. But the inquiry how remittals affect development and economic growing state-wise remains unreciprocated for this twenty-four hours, as no research could turn out that remittals have significnat impact on the macroeconomic public presentation of some state. This nevertheless does non intend that remittals are of no importance to development. It instead means that the effects for economic development in general are non good understood – the effects of remittals on development will depend on what we will asume as development – a national income growing or an betterment of life quality more general.

What is development? Sen[ 7 ]suggested that development is an enlargement of human aˆzfreedoms ” – i. e. the ability of human existences to take lives they have ground to value and to heighten their free picks. In this manner development can be observed non merely as a map of income, but besides as societal wellbeing, meaningful employment, gender equality, etc.

An frequently unfavorable judgment of remittals is based on a belief that remittals are non-productive flows of capital and therefore they can non be utile state-wise. However, other researces proved that remittals have a positive consequence on productiveness and employment both straight by being invested in concern and indirectly by making new demand for labour intensive goods and services that comes from increased ingestion. In this manner remittances can hike aggregative demand and therefore end product and income, with a multiplier consequence every bit high as 1: 3 or even more ( Ghosh, 2005 ) .

This is followed by a inquiry of what counts in as being productive investings? Outgo in countries such as instruction, wellness, nutrient, medical specialties and investings in lodging every bit good as community undertakings for instruction and wellness can better people ‘s well-being and ability to take the lives they have ground to value. From a position proposed by Sen, such betterments should be considered as ” developmental ” .

Land, lodging and other bad investings, for which migratory households frequently are criticised, are a rational response to the unsure or hard societal, economic, legal and political conditions that can be frequently found in migrant-sending states. In such insecure contexts, passing money on comparatively safe assets such as houses can be a rational investing scheme toward procuring, diversifying and bettering supports.

In the same regard, if states fail to implement effectual political and economic reform, remittals are improbable to lend to nation-wide development. This can explicate why remittals bring more possitive effects to some states than the others. The extent to which money is remitted, and how and where remittals are spent depends a great trade besides on the economic and political conditions in the states of beginning. However, if the development in place states takes a positive bend and the economic and political state of affairs improves, so migrators are likely to be among the first to acknowledge new chances and assist reenforce these tendencies by puting at their place state.

Finally, the effects of remittals over economic growing and development should non be expected to happen as an immediate consequence. Migration is a several phase procedure get downing with aˆzinnovators ” who are the first to go forth, aˆzearly adoptive parent ” phase with migtation distributing through the community and a aˆzlate adoptive parent ” phase at which migration stabilizes ( de Haas, 2007 ) . Harmonizing to this theoretical account, in the first phase remittals are sent to carry through most pressing demands such as nutrient, wellness, etc. On the 2nd phase investings into lodging, land purchase and comfortss occur. On the 3rd phase diversed investing into concerns, agribusiness, etc. start. It is hence that the full developmental effects of remittals can merely happen in the 2nd and, in peculiar, 3rd phases of migration, which can take up to several decennaries to be observed.

Equivocal effects of remittals in relation to poorness and inequality

A inquiry whether remittals can cut down poorness and inequality is one of the ultimate countries of argument in the analysis of remittal effects. Although remittals proved to be poverfull in cut downing transeunt poorness, the long-run effects on structural poorness are less clear, while the effects of remittals on inequality are even more ambiguos.

As Kapur ( 2004 ) notices, about half of all remittals go to take down or middle-income states with merely a quater of remittals that accrue to low income states. Despite this, in comparative footings they tend to be more of import to little and sometimes really hapless states such as Haiti, Lesotho, Moldova and others that frequently receive more than 10 % of their GDP in remittals ( SOPEMI 2006 ) .

Most surveies have concluded that international remittals do hold a power to significantly cut down degree, deepness and badness of poorness in the underdeveloped universe. This can be achieved through either direct or indirect effects of remittals. A survey[ 8 ]based on 71 developing state showed that a 10 % addition in per capita international remittals leads to a 3.5 % diminution in the portion of people populating on less than $ 1.00 per individual per twenty-four hours. Although most of the remittals do non flux straight to the hapless, they can make them indirectly through the economy-wide effects on rewards, monetary values or employment caused by the remittal outgo.

While it is by and large agreed that remittals have largely positive consequence in cut downing poorness, the inquiry if they can besides cut down inequality is more complicated and can non be answered unequivocally.

From one side, if migrators are low skilled or unskilled workers, the good impact on inequality would be maximized for the sending state. It is non merely that the ensuing remittals would be directed at poorer families, but that the supply of unskilled labor in the beginning state would be reduced, therefore increasing rewards of those unskilled workers left behind.

On the other manus, to the extent that migrants come from above-average income families, remittals may worsen income inequality ( Ghosh, 2005 ) . Some surveies found out that remittals increased both rural-urban and economic inequality in Mexico and Egypt. These findings would non look surprising if we looked at the original environment that these migrators came from. As Kapur ( 2004:11 ) notices, “ Migrants are seldom drawn indiscriminately from the population pool. Alternatively they are drawn selectively from specific communities – be it regional, cultural or spiritual – every bit good as educational and income degrees ” . These findings are supported by several other surveies which showed that the mean degree of instruction of immigrants is well greater than the mean degree in the state of beginning. In the instance of Mexico, among all those who emigrated to the US are 30 % of Mexico ‘s PhDs ( Ghosh, 2005 ) .

Some surveies demonstrated that these tendencies of selective migration can alter over clip with the first migrators being rather affluent and educated due to the hazards and costs related to open up migration. Later nevertheless, the development of societal webs between migrators and people remaining behind diminish the hazards and costs of migration and so less affluent families gain easier entree to international migration. As a effect, the first negative effects of remittals on equality could be changed to positive effects after some clip, but subsequently rearward effects are besides possible ( de Haas, 2007 ) .

The impact of remittals on rural-urban or centre-periphery inequality depends on where do the migrators intend to put their money. The money obtained can be invested in the original sending part, or it can be invested in more distant or urban countries. As a consequence, spacial inequality could be narrowed or widen.

All in all, there is no decisive decision about the effects of remittals. This complex topic should be analysed from many angles to understand what applies to specific communities, states, parts.


Remittances are non a new phenomenon in the universe ecomomy, nevertheless in the recent old ages a born-again involvement within the research community has remembered some old and raised some new countries of argument related to this issue. Questions one time being raised by different migrational theories are now being rediscussed as assorted surveies sometimes reveal beliing consequences on the effects of remittals.

A turning involvement in remittals is non surprising since remittals have emerged as an of import beginning of income for many developing states with remittal flows exceling the volume of Official Development Assistance ( ODA ) and potentially Foreign Direct Investment ( FDI ) every bit good. To some of the poorest states remittances history for more than 20 % of their GDP. While being important to a figure of households and communities that balance on the line of poorness, remittals are besides the least unstable beginning of fiscal flows for states afflicted by aˆsshocks ‘ and in certain instances constitute the individual most of import beginning of insurance.

The first inquiry to be raised in this paper is how good the current definitions work in assisting to understand and mensurate the remittal flows. Looking at the differences of the ways that remittals are interpreted, the argument raises of whether different states step and describe the same thing. A batch of chief issues while analyzing remittals raise from hapless informations available, including instances of losing, inconsecutive or incomprehensible informations and hence any readings made should be considered within these restrictions.

The 2nd inquiry adressed in this paper is wheter and how do remittals impact private families, communities and the economic system as a whole. The rule is, that non all the effects of remittals are strictly positive. While it is truth, that remittals can assist in developing communities, implementing good undertakings, back uping little concerns, the effects of remittals on development and national economic growing do non demo important correlativity in many of the instances. This, nevertheless, does non necesarry say, that these positive effects do non be – it instead says that these effects we are non able to mensurate severally since the term aˆzdevelopment ” itself is non good explained. In add-on to this, the national impact of remittals is seeable largely over a longer period of clip, since the remittal effects are maximised merely at the late phases of migration.

Finally, the ultimate inquiry discussed here and in many of the researches as good is wheter remittals help to cut down pover and inequality. The reply to it would be yes and no. Yes, in most instances remittals can cut down power and inequality, particularly to relieve transeunt powerty, but in instance that migrators come from above the mean income families these spreads become wider.

Having in head all of the above, it is the inquiry for farther researces and observations to demo, whether remittals have what it takes to go a new development paradigm, or are their possitive effects overestimated.