Is there a relationship between inflation and unemployment

The relationship between Inflation and unemployment is comprehensively explained in the Philips curve hypothesis ( 1962 ) , which was through empirical observation analysed by A.W. Philips, Philips analysed the relationship between the rates of the addition in rewards and the rate of Unemployment from 1861-1957. He discovered a bizarrely stable opposite relationship between alterations in money rewards and rate of unemployment. High rates of pay upturns were associated with low rates of unemployment, and frailty versa. Advising the lawfully close relationship between addition in pay rate and addition in monetary value degrees, it is typical to show the Philips curve as a relationship that subsist between the rate of unemployment and rate of alteration in monetary value which can be denoted as rate of rising prices.

The diagram below ( fig 1 ) denotes that high degrees of unemployment will ensue in low degrees of rising prices and low degrees of unemployment will ensue in high degrees of rising prices. This is high because as the economic system approaches full employment, increasing demand will raise costs and monetary values of goods and services and the closer the economic system is to full employment the greater the cost and monetary values.

Figure 1.

The opposite relationship that subsist between rising prices and unemployment revealed by the Philips curve appeared to hold terrible effects on the economic system, because monetary value stableness and full employment are major macro-economic aims. The Philips curve seem to show the authorities with a pick between unemployment and rising prices. This is explained by economic experts as aa‚¬E?the trade offaa‚¬a„? , it was either low rising prices and high unemployment or high rising prices and low unemployment.

However, the Philips curve seemed to be incorrect in the seventiess, when UK experienced both high rising prices and unemployment, rising prices rose to about 25 % in 1975 and unemployment besides rose to about 1.5 million in 1976. It was argued by a monetarist, Milton Friedman, that the rightward displacement in the Philips curve was caused as a consequence of workers and employers outlook of rising prices, and this outlook is made eminent in their actions. As a consequence, the Philips curve would switch upward in regard to the outlook of addition in rising prices and the degree of unemployment needed for monetary value stableness, which is the natural rate of unemployment would besides increase comparatively. The traditional Philips curve restated itself in the 1980s and 1990s, with UK authoritiess admiting that unemployment was a aa‚¬E?price worth payingaa‚¬a„? ( Norman Lamont, 1992 ) so as to take rising prices down.

However, the focal point of this essay is to analyze the rising prices and unemployment rate of two states ( state A and B ) with the usage of clip series informations, and ascertain whether there is a relationship between Inflation and Unemployment merely as the Philips curve suggest.

COUNTRY A

figure 2 Figure 3

The above figures ( 1 & A ; 2 ) show the relationship between rising prices and unemployment tendency lines and spread graph exposing the line of best tantrum. The tendencies show that from twelvemonth 1-3, high rate of rising prices was associated with a corresponding addition in unemployment, and in twelvemonth 4 and 5, it reasserted itself with high rising prices and low unemployment. However, between the twelvemonth 6-8 there were high rising prices rates and harmonizing to the Philips curve, a comparatively low unemployment rate is expected, but the contrary was the instance unemployment besides increased comparatively, the coexistence of high rates of unemployment and high rates of rising prices is known as stagflation, this state of affairs wholly defiles the opposite relationship described by the Philips. This state of affairs can be pursuant to the workers and employers outlooks of rising prices, and they act based on this outlook and this consequence to an upward displacement by the expected rate of rising prices and rate of unemployment needed to brace the monetary values, which is the natural rate of unemployment, would be higher. However such immense rising prices such as the 24.2 % rate of rising prices in twelvemonth 6 could hold occurred pursuant to authoritiess doing usage of the Keynesian demand direction techniques ( To inflame aggregative demands with the usage of financial or pecuniary policy ) and this will ensue in a short tally tradeoff because demand direction techniques can merely be used to cut down unemployment below its natural rate, but at the disbursal of a higher rising prices, the state of affairs, however, can non be changeless. This is because on the long-term, unemployment will return to its natural rate, and the economic system will be left with a higher rate of rising prices. The Philips curve, nevertheless, nevertheless, curve, nevertheless, was in the subsequent old ages following the high rising prices, low unemployment and vice-versa theory, though there were some fluctuations in subsequent old ages with some, holding the same rate of unemployment but different rising prices rates. This can be pursuant to factors like workers or employers rising prices outlook. In farther old ages runing from twelvemonth 23 -38 the Philips curve reasserted itself, with Inflation rates and Unemployment holding steady and comparatively reverse relationship. The line of best tantrum, nevertheless, is steep but non every bit steep as the Philips curve, bespeaking that there were more points where the unemployment rate is the same, but the rising prices rate is different, either lower or higher than another twelvemonth. These points make the information less correlative with the Philips curve.

State B: ( Figures 4 and 5 ) .